Evidence of multiple stocks of catfish, Rita rita (Hamilton), from the Ganges Basin on the basis of an integrated analysis of truss morphometrics, otolith microchemistry, and otolith shape
Résumé fourni par la source
Context Management of Rita rita (Hamilton) in India is hampered by a lack of understanding of possible stock structure. Aim To investigate possible spatial stock structure of Rita rita in the Ganges Basin. Methods Independent analyses of landmark-based truss morphometry, otolith elemental analysis and otolith shape were conducted to investigate the stock structure of the catfish (Rita rita) from the Ganga River and its tributaries Yamuna and Ramganga. Key results Each of the stock-delineation approaches, namely, truss morphometrics, otolith elemental composition and otolith shape, showed significant differences among the fish groups from three sampling locations (P = 0.003). Despite these differences, reclassification analyses showed variable (although all greater than random) reclassification rates (truss morphometry: 78%, otoliths elemental data: 98%, otolith shape: 50%). Conclusions An integrated view of the three analyses suggested spatial structuring and that there may be multiple stocks of Rita rita in the Ganges Basin. Implications Future investigations should consider possible variations in demographic parameters that may affect fisheries management. The multiple-lines-of-evidence approach taken in this study can serve as a template for studies of other species in any region.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Evidence of multiple stocks of catfish, Rita rita (Hamilton), from the Ganges Basin on the basis of an integrated analysis of truss morphometrics, otolith microchemistry, and otolith shape
- Date Crossref
- 16/06/2023
- Éditeur
- CSIRO Publishing
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.