Genomic characterization between HER2 ‐positive and negative gastric cancer patients in a prospective trial

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: We aimed to clarify the genomic characteristics of HER2-positive and negative gastric cancer cases that potentially affect tumor progression and treatment response in a prospective trial. METHODS: We collected 80 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples (49 HER2+ and 31 HER2-) from gastric cancer patients who participated in the TROX-A1 trial (UMIN000036865). We queried a 435-gene panel (CANCERPLEX-JP) to generate comprehensive genomic profiling data, including the tumor mutation burden, somatic mutations, and copy number variations. In addition, the genomic differences between HER2+ and HER2- gastric cancer patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Mutational analyses showed that TP53 was the most frequently mutated gene regardless of HER2 status. ARID1A mutation was significantly enriched in HER2-negative patients. The number of total mutations in HER2-negative patients with ARID1A mutation was remarkably higher than that in HER2-positive patients. Next, copy number variation analyses showed that the number of amplified genes (such as CCNE1, PGAP3, and CDK12) in HER2-positive cases was significantly higher than that in HER2-negative cases. Moreover, PTEN deletion was more common in HER2-positive cases. Finally, we found that, compared with HER2-positive patients, HER2-negative patients tended to have a higher tumor mutation burden, particularly in patients with ARID1A mutation. Pathway analyses of the gene alterations showed an enrichment of several immune-related pathways in HER2-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: According to the genomic profiling of HER2-positive and negative gastric cancer, several gene alterations in the HER2 pathway may be the potential mechanism underlying trastuzumab resistance. Relative to HER2-positive gastric cancer, HER2-negative gastric tumors with ARID1A mutation may be sensitive to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.