Aller au contenu principal
2022 conference-abstract

Abstract 14451: Mechanistic Classification and Outcomes of Isolated Aortic Regurgitation in a Contemporary Cohort of Patients

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : ca, sa. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Introduction: Aortic valve regurgitation (AR) is due to leaflet disease and/or dilatation of the functional aortic annulus complex. Understanding the mechanism(s) of AR informs surgical planning of valve and aorta repair. In this study we aimed to examine the etiologies, mechanisms, and outcomes of isolated pure native severe AR in a contemporary consecutive cohort of patients. Methods: From our institutional echocardiography database, we identified all patients with native moderate-to-severe (3+) or severe (4+) AR between 2014-2019. Patients with infective endocarditis, aortic dissection, or other concomitant valve disease were excluded. AR was classified using the El-Khoury classification: Type I-normal leaflet motion (Ia = ascending aorta and sinotubular junction dilatation, Ib = aortic root dilation, Ic = aortic annular dilation), Type II-leaflet prolapse, and Type III-leaflet restriction. Valve anatomy and clinical outcomes were also extracted. Results: A total of 560 patients with at least moderate-to-severe (3+) AR were identified, 270 were excluded (92 patients for endocarditis, 152 patients for concomitant valvulopathy, 23 patients for acute aortic dissection, and 11 patients for other reasons), and 282 patients (77.3% male) were included. The most common mechanism was Type II (leaflet prolapse), idenfied in 98 (35%) patients. Multiple mechanisms of AR were identified in 164 (58%) patients. The most common combination was Type Ib (aortic root dilation) and Type II (leaflet prolapse) seen in 45 (27%) patients. Ninety-nine (35%) patients had a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). Follow-up was available for 275 patients (98%) with a median duration of 4.7±2.4 years. Of the 158 (57%) patients who underwent surgical intervention, valve repair was performed in 77 patients (49%) and valve replacement in 80 (51%) patients. Valve intervention was more common in women (70%) than in men (54%). Conclusion: In a large contemporary cohort of patients with at least moderate to severe (3+) isolated pure native AR, Type II (leaflet prolapse) was the most common mechanism, however multiple mechanisms are present in most AR patients. Aortic valve repair now accounts for almost half of the surgical interventions for isolated AR in our center.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Abstract 14451: Mechanistic Classification and Outcomes of Isolated Aortic Regurgitation in a Contemporary Cohort of Patients
Date Crossref
08/11/2022
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Cardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsInfective Endocarditis Diagnosis and ManagementAortic Disease and Treatment Approaches

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.