Effect of Peri-Operative Blood Transfusion on Short and Long-Term Mortality Rates in Elderly Patients With Neck of Femur Fractures: A Retrospective Study

Le résumé fourni par la source

Introduction The current reported mortality rate for elderly neck of femur fractures (eNOFF) is relatively high in the UK. eNOFF patients commonly suffer from associated cardiovascular co-morbidities and tend to have fragile physiological states and poor physiological reserves. Although some studies have shown a potential link between blood transfusion and mortality in eNOFF patients, there is no general consensus on this matter. Therefore, our study aims to explore the possible association between blood transfusion and length of hospital stay (LOHS) as well as short- and long-term mortality rates in eNOFF patients by reviewing the practice of blood transfusion. Methods This retrospective study was conducted at Wrexham Maelor Hospital, which is part of the Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board (BCUHB), Wales. The study included patients who were 65 years of age or older and presented with neck of femur fractures. Only patients who required surgical intervention were included, and those managed non-operatively were excluded from the study. The statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). Furthermore, unpaired t-tests and log-rank (Mantel-Cox) tests were performed to compare the groups that received blood transfusions. Results During the study period, a total of 501 eNOFF patients were included in the primary cohort of the study, with a mean age of 81 years (ranging from 65 to 102). The majority of the patients were female (n=340). Of the 501 patients, 79 (15.8%) received a blood transfusion during their treatment. Around 52.9% of the eNOFF patients were categorized as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) III, but there was no statistically significant difference in the requirement of blood transfusion between patients in ASA III, II, and IV categories, as compared to ASA I. Additionally, the mean time to surgery was higher in patients who received a blood transfusion (35.8 hours), and this difference was statistically significant (p=0.035). Moreover, the average LOHS after surgery for eNOFF was longer in patients who needed peri-operative blood transfusion (22 days), and this difference in the means was statistically significant (p=0.022). At the one-year post-surgery mark, mortality was higher in the transfused group (33%), and long-term five-year mortality rates were also higher in this group (63.2%). Conclusion Peri-operative blood transfusion may confer certain benefits in the management of eNOFF ptients. However, it should not be regarded as a panacea for improving long-term outcomes. The decision to administer blood transfusion must be made on a case-by-case basis, with careful assessment of individual clinical indications, and the potential risks and benefits taken into consideration. To achieve optimal clinical outcomes, close monitoring and follow-up of eNOFF patients, both in the short-term and long-term, are essential.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.