Patients’ Characteristics and General Practitioners’ Management of Patients with Symptom Diagnoses
Rattachement africain : nl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
INTRODUCTION: Symptom diagnoses are diagnoses used in primary care when the relevant diagnostic criteria of a disease are not fulfilled. Although symptom diagnoses often get resolved spontaneously without a clearly defined illness nor treatment, up to 38% of these symptoms persist more than 1 year. It is largely unknown how often symptom diagnoses occur, which symptoms persist, and how general practitioners (GPs) manage them. AIM: Explore morbidity rates, characteristics and management of patients with nonpersistent (≤1 year) and persistent (>1 year) symptom diagnoses. METHODS: tests to summarize and compare patients' characteristics and GP management strategies in the nonpersistent and persistent groups. RESULTS: The incidence rate of symptom diagnoses was 767 episodes per 1000 patient-years. The prevalence rate was 485 patients per 1000 patient-years. Out of the patients who had a contact with their GPs, 58% had at least 1 symptom diagnosis, from which 16% were persistent (>1 year). In the persistent group, we found significantly more females (64% vs 57%), older patients (mean: 49 vs 36 years of age), patients with more comorbidities (71% vs 49%), psychological (17% vs 12%) and social (8% vs 5%) problems. Prescriptions (62% vs 23%) and referral (62.7% vs 30.6%) rates were significantly higher in persistent symptom episodes. CONCLUSION: Symptom diagnoses are highly prevalent (58%) of which a considerable part (16%) persists more than a year.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Patients’ Characteristics and General Practitioners’ Management of Patients with Symptom Diagnoses
- Date Crossref
- 08/05/2023
- Éditeur
- American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Radboud University Nijmegen pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Radboud University Medical Center pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
Radboud University Medical Centre Radboud Institute of Health Sciences pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Radboud University Nijmegen, Radboud University Medical Center et Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, avec 1 autre affiliation.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.