High resolution 2D plastic scintillator detectors for radiotherapy departments

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Introduction Plastic scintillation detectors (PSD) have been developed for over four decades and are widely used in a variety of fields, but one can find relatively few reports of their clinical use compared to other dosimetric solutions. Material and methods The inexpensive detector setup made of a Saint-Gobain BC-400 plastic scintillator and commercially available on the market CMOS-based DSLR Pentax camera was investigated. Build PSD detectors were irradiated with 6, 10 and 15 MV flattening filtered (FF) and 6 and 10 MV flattening filter free (FFF) photon beams using a clinical linear accelerator. Data were processed using Matlab software to remove background and artefacts. A comparison of the spatial resolution parameters to the Gafchromic EBT3 films was performed. Results Average dose difference between TPS and PSD was 1.1%. The measured spatial resolution was 0.29 mm, and it differed from the film by 1.1%. MTF50 for PSD was 0.57 mm higher than the Gafchromic film. Signal to dose fit function with an R-square equal to 0.999 was established. The standard deviation of mean pixels value for a series of measurements was below 0.1%, for variable dose rate dependence was below 0.6% and for different energies 1.1%. It was demonstrated that such a setup allows a satisfactory signal-to-dose dependence and provides high spatial resolution at an affordable price compared to a 2D ion chamber or a diode detector array. Moreover, PSDs are reusable and provide a simple readout compared to Gafchromic films commonly used in radiotherapy departments. Conclusions Variable parameters of the camera allow to select signal values at the optimal level. The system presented excellent signal stability, high image resolution and a simple signal-to-dose relationship which encourages further work to investigate PSDs for use in radiation therapy departments.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.