Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2023 article

A retrospective evaluation of characterization, clinical course and anaesthesia management of emergency trauma surgical patients during first wave of COVID-19 pandemic at a tertiary care center in India

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : in. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in nationwide lockdown followed by phased unlock to break the chain of transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in India. Management of emergency trauma patients has been particularly challenging for anaesthesiologists in order to treat these high risk group of patients and preventing cross infection to healthy patients as well as health care personnel. : It is a single centre retrospective observational cohort study conducted at tertiary care hospital in North India in the patients who underwent emergency trauma surgeries during 31 March 2020-31 May 2020(Lockdown) and compared with data from 1 June 2020-31 July 2020(Unlock). To compare the effect of lockdown and unlock during first wave of Covid-19 pandemic on the volume of emergency trauma surgical patients operated within 24 hours of admission. : To evaluate the difference between the two periods of lockdown and unlock a) in the mortality rates b) covid status c) the length of hospital stay d) the mechanism of injury e)severity of injury f)proportion of aerosol generating procedures (AGP) utilized and g)demographics of the patients. Our anaesthesia experience of managing the patients differently in the pandemic, identify areas for improvement, particularly in terms of minimising exposure and optimising resource usage in the management of such emergency patients in the event of a future healthcare crisis is also discussed. Over the 2 periods of lockdown and unlock there was no statistical difference in number, age or sex distribution of the patients presenting for emergency trauma surgery. Number of covid positive patients were slightly higher during unlock but it was statistically insignificant (p=0.07) and the number of patients died during unlock was also higher during unlock as compared to lockdown but statistically insignificant(p=0.3). The median injury severity score and length of stay was also not statistically significant between two periods. Road traffic accidents were most common type of injury in both the groups, self-inflicted injury occurred in 5 patients during lockdown and zero during unlock, none of these showed a significant difference (p > 0.06). General anaesthesia was the most common anaesthesia technique used in both the periods. Emergency trauma surgeries will continue to occur even in different phases of pandemics, anaesthesiologists should plan and prepare appropriately to provide anaesthesia and emergency care to these patients and prevent cross infection in healthy patients and health care workers.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
A retrospective evaluation of characterization, clinical course and anaesthesia management of emergency trauma surgical patients during first wave of COVID-19 pandemic at a tertiary care center in India
Date Crossref
15/06/2023
Éditeur
IP Innovative Publication Pvt Ltd
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

COVID-19 and healthcare impactsDisaster Response and ManagementCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.