Monitoring COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 hospitalisation and death using electronic health registries in ≥65-years-old population in six European countries, October 2021 to November 2022

Résumé fourni par la source

Background: Within the ECDC-VEBIS project, we prospectively monitored vaccine effectiveness (VE) against COVID-19 hospitalisation and COVID-19-related death, using electronic health registries (EHR), between October 2021 and November 2022, in community-dwelling residents aged 65–79 and ≥80-years in six European countries. Methods: EHR linkage was used to construct population cohorts in Belgium, Denmark, Luxembourg, Navarre (Spain), Norway and Portugal. Using a common protocol, for each outcome (hospitalisation and death), VE was estimated monthly over eight-week follow-up periods, allowing one month-lag for data consolidation. Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and VE=(1 – aHR) x100. Site-specific estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Results: For ≥80-years, VE against COVID-19 hospitalisation decreased from 66.9% (95%CI: 60.1; 72.6) to 36.1% (95%CI: -27.3; 67.9) for the primary vaccination and from 95.6% (95%CI: 88.0; 98.4) to 67.7% (95%CI: 45.9; 80.8) for the first booster. Similar trends were observed for 65-79-years. The second booster VE against hospitalisation ranged between 82.0% (95%CI: 75.9; 87.0) and 83.9% (95%CI: 77.7; 88.4) for the ≥80-years and between 39.3% (95%CI: -3.9; 64.5) and 80.6% (95%CI: 67.2; 88.5) for 65-79-years. The first booster VE against COVID-19-related death declined over time for both age groups, while the second booster VE against death remained above 80% for the ≥80-years. Conclusions: Successive vaccine boosters played a relevant role in maintaining protection against COVID-19 hospitalisation and death, in the context of decreasing VE over time. Multi-country data from EHR facilitate robust near-real-time monitoring of VE in the EU/EEA and supports public health decision-making.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.