Intratumoral Administration of Recombinant Murine Interleukin‐12 Prevents Tumor Progression and Bone Invasion
Résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) frequently invades the mandibular bone, leading to metastasis and poor prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effects of locally administered interleukin-12 (IL-12) using an immunocompetent mouse model mimicking the clinical features of mandibular bone invasion. METHODS: The effects of IL-12 on tumor growth and bone resorption were evaluated using subcutaneous and bone invasion models of OSCC in both immunocompetent and athymic mice. Bone resorption was assessed by micro-computed tomography (CT). In addition, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was performed to quantify the expression of osteoclast markers (Acp5, Ctsk) and immune-related genes (Ifng, Fasl). RESULTS: Intratumoral injection of recombinant murine IL-12 (r-mIL-12) significantly prolonged mouse survival and suppressed tumor growth in immunocompetent mice. Micro-CT revealed reduced bone resorption in the r-mIL-12-treated group. Consistently, qPCR demonstrated downregulation of Acp5 and Ctsk, along with upregulation of Ifng and Fasl compared to controls. In contrast, r-mIL-12 treatment had no significant effect on tumor growth or bone resorption in athymic mice, underscoring the importance of T cells in controlling bone invasion. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that local administration of r-mIL-12 may serve as an effective therapeutic approach for OSCC with mandibular bone invasion.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Intratumoral Administration of Recombinant Murine Interleukin‐12 Prevents Tumor Progression and Bone Invasion
- Date Crossref
- 02/09/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.