Baseline rhythm during catheter ablation for atrial tachycardia predicts procedural and clinical outcome

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Atrial tachycardias (AT) occurring after previous ablation in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation (AF) are increasingly observed in clinical practice. Catheter ablation is the treatment of choice but an optimal workflow to improve patient outcome has not been defined. The prognostic implications of baseline rhythm at the beginning of AT ablation are unknown. Purpose The aim of this study was to assess procedural and clinical outcome depending on baseline rhythm during AT ablation. Methods A total of 380 patients with a history of AF who underwent catheter ablation for consecutive AT after previous ablation were analysed. Results In our study population (69 (61–75) years, 56.6% male), 140 patients (36.8%) presented in baseline sinus rhythm (SR), 208 (54.7%) with AT and 32 (8.4%) with AF at the beginning of the procedure. Patients in SR or with AT underwent shorter procedures (SR: 173 (132–213) minutes vs. AT: 161 (120–203) minutes vs. AF: 226 (154–249) minutes; P=0.002) with more frequent termination to SR (SR: 87.9% vs. AT: 81.3% vs. AF: 56.3%; P<0.001) than patients with AF. Periprocedural AT cycle length was longer in patients presenting in SR than in those with AT or AF (SR: 320 (265–370) ms vs. AT: 270 (240–310) ms vs. AF: 245 (193–278) ms; P<0.001). Acute procedural success did not differ between patients in SR or with AT but was higher compared to those with AF (SR: 96.4% vs. AT: 97.1% vs. AF: 87.5%; P=0.033). During a median follow-up of 290 (181–680) days, patients in baseline SR developed arrhythmia recurrences less often (SR: 36.4% vs. AT: 49.5% vs. AF: 68.8%; P=0.002) compared to patients with AT or AF. Conclusions Baseline rhythm during AT ablation predicts procedural and clinical outcome. Whereas acute procedural success does not differ between patients in SR or with AT, patients presenting in SR have a more favourable mid-term success rate. Restoration of SR prior to ablation might improve long-term outcome by reducing the risk for recurrent arrhythmia.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.