Aller au contenu principal
2023 conference-abstract

Undetected Maternal Cell Contamination in Products of Conception Analysis May Mask Recurrence Risks for Future Pregnancies: A Case Report and Discussion [ID: 1377203]

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: Maternal cell contamination (MCC) in products of conception (POC) tissue is common; some studies report 59% of 46,XX results represent MCC. METHODS: Products of conception tissue and maternal blood samples were shipped to a laboratory for genotyping using Illumina CytoSNP-12b microarrays and bioinformatics (IRB E&I 19040-03A). Patient informed consent was obtained for submission of a case report. RESULTS: A 25-year-old woman with a family history of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) was first offered POC analysis after her second loss. The result was normal female; however, MCC could not be ruled out because a maternal sample was not provided. Thus, the result was presumed normal, and the patient was informed her testing did not identify a genetic cause for her loss. The patient's third miscarriage was sent for POC analysis with a parental sample, which identified a maternally derived 26.8-Mb terminal deletion and 39.3-Mb terminal duplication of chromosome 4. The submitted maternal sample allowed for reanalysis of the second loss confirming MCC. Maternal karyotype analysis revealed an abnormal result: 46,XX,inv(4)(p15.2q31.3). The patient was referred to reproductive endocrinology for discussion of options, including in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing. CONCLUSION: Undetected MCC can lead to erroneous normal female results, masking fetal findings that could affect recurrence risks. Since 5% of couples with RPL have a balanced chromosome rearrangement, almost six couples for every 1,000 losses are at risk for undetected MCC masking recurrence risks (calculated using a 50% expected aneuploidy rate and 59% of 46,XX results actually representing MCC).

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Undetected Maternal Cell Contamination in Products of Conception Analysis May Mask Recurrence Risks for Future Pregnancies: A Case Report and Discussion [ID: 1377203]
Date Crossref
01/05/2023
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Natera (United States) pays non établi dans la notice
    Entreprise
  • Inc Natera pays non établi dans la notice
    Entreprise

Natera (United States) et Natera — Inc.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.