Immediate implant placement with and without provisionalization: A comparison of a one-year longitudinal study
Rattachement africain : tw. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Immediate implant placement (IIP) with and without immediate provisionalization (Ipro) may yield satisfactory results in appropriate indications and treatment, especially in the esthetic zone. The aim of this study was to compare implant stability, marginal bone loss (MBL), survival rates, and patient satisfaction between IIP with Ipro and IIP without Ipro. Seventy patients, each with a failed maxillary anterior tooth, were randomly assigned to IIP with Ipro (Group A: n = 35) or IIP without Ipro (Group B: n = 35). Implant stability quotient (ISQ) and standardized periapical radiographs were performed at surgery and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively to investigate implant stability and MBL, respectively. Survival was assessed 1 year after surgery. Patient satisfaction was evaluated with a visual analogue scale (VAS). Primary ISQ and MBL were not significantly different between groups A and B immediately after surgery (P ＞ 0.05). Implant survival was 100% in both groups, and only one mechanical complication was observed. Patient satisfaction was good at definitive crown delivery and postoperatively 1-year in both groups. However, the immediate postoperative VAS score in Group A was significantly higher than that in Group B (P < 0.05). Group A revealed significantly higher secondary ISQ than Group B at postoperatively 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. There were no significant differences between groups A and B in terms of MBL and survival. Notably, patient satisfaction in Group A was significantly higher than in Group B immediately after surgery.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Immediate implant placement with and without provisionalization: A comparison of a one-year longitudinal study
- Date Crossref
- 01/07/2023
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Kaohsiung Medical University Department of Clinical Dentistry pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Feng Chia University Advanced Medical Devices and Composites Laboratory pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
School of Dentistry pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
College of Pharmacy Department of Fragrance and Cosmetic Science pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Department of Clinical Dentistry — Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital et Advanced Medical Devices and Composites Laboratory — Feng Chia University, avec 2 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.