Are high frequency marsquakes caused by meteoroid impacts? Implications for a seismically determined impact rate on Mars
Rattachement africain : ch, us, gb, de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract The crater density on planetary surfaces is used to determine their ages throughout the solar system, which requires a model for the rate of meteorite impacts of different sizes. For craters smaller than 30 meters, this rate has been observed from the generation of new craters in repeated orbital images. For larger craters, the rate was extrapolated from the lunar surface ages, taking into account the atmospheric removal of small craters. It has been observed that both estimates do not match for crater diameters smaller than 30 meters. The NASA InSight seismometer SEIS provided a new independent constraint, when it recorded seismic signals of several impacts during its mission. These confirmed impacts are part of a larger class of marsquakes (Very High Frequency, VF), all of which have characteristics consistent with an impact origin. We show that these VFs are plausibly caused by meteorite impacts and derive the impact rate required to explain their numbers. An empirical scaling relationship is used to convert between seismic moment and crater diameter. We apply area and time corrections to derive a global impact rate and find that the derived rate is 210--290 craters >8m globally per year, consistent with previously published chronology model rates and above the rates derived from freshly imaged craters.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Are high frequency marsquakes caused by meteoroid impacts? Implications for a seismically determined impact rate on Mars
- Date Crossref
- 08/05/2023
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.