Aller au contenu principal
2023 article

A History of Headache Medicine Training in the United States (P4-3.007)

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Le résumé fourni par la source

Objective: To review the history of training in Headache Medicine in the 20th and 21st Century in America and provide insights into key dates and events that shape current practice. Background: Headache is a burgeoning field within Neurology with 49 fellowships now UCNS accredited. These accredited centers represent signficant growth over short period. Unofficial apprenticeships date to the 1940s with Montefiore Hospital. The last 14 years accreditation has been under UCNS with subsequent exponential growth of programs. 700+ candidates hold certificates with invagination of training programs into academic centers around the country making higher level care available to more. Design/Methods: The timeline of UCNS was reviewed and information gathered about which programs became certified with the data graphed out and compared to yearly certification numbers of specialists. Individuals at centers including the Diamond Institute, the Graham Institute, the Jefferson H Center and Montefiore Center were interviewed and primary sources were contacted to discuss the history. Finally, a literature search was performed to look into what headache centers existed prior to inception of the UCNS and to understand what model of education was performed and how successful those centers were at developing new headache specialists in practice. Results: The last 15 years led to more formalized structure for accreditation of programs and certification of specialists under the UCNS. Historically training centers were limited, idiosynchratic and followed an apprenticeship model. The current growth in training programs has led to 49 current acc credited programs and dozens of yearly graduates. Several named centers have trained a large volume of providers and have fostered practitioners who have created other centers. Conclusions: Schools of thought in Headache Medicine have grown around several centers with roots in an apprenticeship form of education. Over 15 years fellowship training has become more formalized, clearer in objectives and in expectations for trainees with dramatic growth. Disclosure: Dr. Rosen has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Northwell Health. An immediate family member of Dr. Rosen has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of New York University. Dr. Rosen has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Allergan/ Abbvie. Dr. Rosen has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Amgen/ Novartis. Dr. Rosen has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Eli Lilly. Dr. Rosen has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Lundbeck. Dr. Rosen has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Biohaven. Dr. Rosen has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Theranica. Dr. Rosen has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Allergan/ Abbvie. Dr. Rosen has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as an Editor, Associate Editor, or Editorial Advisory Board Member for Springer. Dr. Rosen has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Speaker with American Headache Society.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
A History of Headache Medicine Training in the United States (P4-3.007)
Date Crossref
25/04/2023
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les sujets associés

Medical and Biological SciencesHistory of Medical Practice

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.