Constant void ratio vs. constant confining pressure tests on partially saturated silty soil
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The presence of soil solids, water, and air complicates understanding unsaturated soil dynamics. A thorough understanding of unsaturated soil behavior is essential for the fruitful design of slopes, embankments, and retaining structures. A series of constant void ratio and constant confining pressure triaxial compression tests were carried out under constant water content conditions (pore air pressure drained and pore water pressure undrained) to study the shear strength and deformation characteristics of a partially saturated silty soil. Test specimens were prepared with a water content of 15%, 20% (Optimum water content), and 25%, with the corresponding degree of saturation of 37, 49, and 62.5%. The degree of compaction of all specimens was kept at 83% while the dry density was 1.29 g/cm3, and the void ratio was around 1.045. All the samples were isotropically consolidated under 500kPa by keeping deviatoric stress at 0kPa. The constant void ratio test results showed that the deviatoric stress reached a peak value followed by a sudden decrease within the axial strain of 0-1.5%. In contrast, the deviatoric stress increased continuously until reaching the critical state without depicting any peak for constant confining pressure tests. However, in both cases, the lower the water content at the time of specimen preparation, the higher the shear resistance.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Constant void ratio vs. constant confining pressure tests on partially saturated silty soil
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2023
- Éditeur
- EDP Sciences
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.