Genetic assessment of the value of restoration planting within an endangered eucalypt woodland
Rattachement africain : au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Assessment of woodland restoration often focusses on stand demographics, but genetic factors likely influence long-term stand viability. We examined the genetic composition of Yellow Box (Eucalyptus melliodora) trees in endangered Box-Gum Grassy Woodland in SE Australia, some 30 years after planting with seeds of reportedly local provenance. Using DArT sequencing for 1406 SNPs, we compared genetic diversity and population structure of planted E. melliodora trees with remnant bushland trees, paddock trees and natural recruits. Genetic patterns imply that natural stands and paddock trees had historically high gene flow (among group pairwise FST = 0.04–0.10). Genetic diversity was highest among relictual paddock trees (He = 0.17), while diversity of revegetated trees was identical to natural bushland trees (He = 0.14). Bayesian clustering placed the revegetated trees into six genetic groups with four corresponding to genotypes from paddock trees, indicating that revegetated stands are mainly of genetically diverse, local provenance. Natural recruits were largely derived from paddock trees with some contribution from planted trees. A few trees have likely hybridised with other local eucalypt species which are unlikely to compromise stand integrity. We show that paddock trees have high genetic diversity and capture historic genetic variety and provide important foci for natural recruitment of genetically diverse and outcrossed seedlings.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Genetic assessment of the value of restoration planting within an endangered eucalypt woodland
- Date Crossref
- 21/04/2023
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
University of Wollongong Independent Researcher pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Wollongong Hospital pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
NSW Department of Planning and Environment pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
School of Earth Centre for Sustainable Ecosystem Solutions pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Science pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
Independent Researcher — University of Wollongong, Wollongong Hospital et NSW Department of Planning and Environment, avec 2 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.