Drug resistance and susceptibility of amikacin in children with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales: a systematic review with meta-analysis
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Antibiotic resistance surveillance may be essential to identify patterns of antibiotic resistance and guide treatment choices. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate amikacin resistance and susceptibility in children with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-PE). From inception to September 5, 2022, relevant studies were searched via PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. A network meta-analysis was conducted to explore the sequencing of resistance rates in amikacin and other antibiotics. Totally, 26 studies with 2582 clusters of bacterial isolates were included. The resistance rate of amikacin in children with ESBL-PE was 10.1%, higher than the resistance rate of tigecycline (0.0%), ertapenem (0.4%), meropenem (0.7%), and imipenem (3.0%). For the drug susceptibility rate in children with ESBL-PE, the susceptibility rate of amikacin (89.7%) was lower than tigecycline (99.6%), imipenem (96.8%), meropenem (97.3%), and ertapenem (95.6%). Amikacin showed a low drug resistance and a high drug resistance in children with ESBL-PE infection, making it a good option for the treatment of the infection caused by ESBL-PE.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Drug resistance and susceptibility of amikacin in children with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales: a systematic review with meta-analysis
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2023
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.