Encouraging workforce diversity- supporting medical students with mobility and sensory disabilities
Rattachement africain : us, ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
PURPOSE: This article is prepared by the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics Undergraduate Medical Education Committee and provides educators recommendations for optimizing inclusive education for our students with disabilities. Medical educators are increasingly encountering students with disabilities and have the responsibility of ensuring requirements are met. METHOD: Medical education committee members from the US and Canada reviewed the literature on disabilities in medical student education to identify best practices and key discussion points. An iterative review process was used to determine the contents of an informative paper. RESULTS: Medical schools are required to develop technical standards for admission, retention, and graduation of their students to practice medicine safely and effectively with reasonable accommodation. A review of the literature and obstetrics and gynecology expert opinion formed a practical list of accommodation strategies and administrative steps to assist educators and students. CONCLUSION: Medical schools must support the inclusion of students with disabilities. We recommend a collaborative approach to the interactive process of determining reasonable and effective accommodations that includes the students, a disability resource professional and faculty as needed. Recruiting and supporting medical students with a disability strengthens the diversity commitment and creates a more inclusive workforce.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Encouraging workforce diversity- supporting medical students with mobility and sensory disabilities
- Date Crossref
- 19/04/2023
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Washington University in St. Louis Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Michigan State University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Saskatchewan Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
The University of Texas at Tyler pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Vermont pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Loyola University Chicago Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Michigan Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Florida Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Florida College pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Connecticut Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Harvard University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology — Washington University in St. Louis, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology — Michigan State University et Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology — University of Saskatchewan, avec 9 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.