Dissipation, Residue Analysis, and Dietary Risk Assessment of Chlorantraniliprole and Indoxacarb in Rice
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
A residue analytical method for the determination of chlorantraniliprole and indoxacarb in brown rice, rice husk, and rice straw was validated using a revised QuEChERS method coupled with high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS), and field trials were conducted in 12 regions to study the dissipation and final residues of the two pesticides in rice crop. In the method validation, chlorantraniliprole and indoxacarb had average recoveries ranging from 79% to 110%, with relative standard deviations (RSD) of 1.2% to 12.2%. The dissipation experiments showed that the half-lives of chlorantraniliprole in brown rice and rice husk were 12.4-29.8 and 4.6-11.2 d, respectively, whereas the dissipation half-lives of indoxacarb were 10.3-20.4 and 4.4-8.1 d, respectively. As for the final residues in the 12 regions, rice samples were collected on the 28 and 35 d after the last application. The maximum residues of chlorantraniliprole and indoxacarb in rice grain were 0.38 mg/kg and 0.080 mg/kg, respectively, and in brown rice, the maximum residues of chlorantraniliprole and indoxacarb were 0.028 mg/kg and 0.040 mg/kg, respectively. These values were all below the relevant Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) in China. Using the final residue results and the food consumption data, the long-term dietary risk assessment indicated that the residues of these two pesticides in rice would not pose unacceptable dietary risk to the general population.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Dissipation, Residue Analysis, and Dietary Risk Assessment of Chlorantraniliprole and Indoxacarb in Rice
- Date Crossref
- 18/04/2023
- Éditeur
- Universal Wiser Publisher Pte. Ltd
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
China Agricultural University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
College of Science Innovation Center of Pesticide Research pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
China Agricultural University et Innovation Center of Pesticide Research — College of Science.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.