Efficacy of fresh-frozen cadaveric surgical training for arteriovenous fistula in vascular access

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Creation of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) as vascular access is a basic operation that should be learned by all surgeons involved in renal failure treatment. AVF creation is often challenging for inexperienced young surgeons because it requires comprehensive surgical techniques. For such young surgeons, we introduced cadaveric surgical training (CST) for AVF creation using fresh-frozen cadavers (FFCs). This study was performed to identify the differences in AVF surgical techniques between FFCs and living bodies and to examine the impact of CST on young surgeons. METHODS: Twelve CST sessions were performed for AVF creation at the Clinical Anatomy Education and Research Center of Tokushima University Hospital from March 2021 to June 2022. Seven young surgeons (1st- and 2nd-year) performed the operation, and two surgeons (10th- and 11th-year) supervised it. We conducted an anonymous questionnaire survey using a 5-point Likert scale to examine the impact of CST on young surgeons. RESULTS: Twelve CST sessions were performed on nine FFCs. All training sessions allowed completion of AVF creation with a median operative time of 78.5 min. Although veins and arteries were more difficult to identify than in a living body, other surgical operations could be performed in the same way as in a living body. All the respondents stated that it was good for them to experience CST. In addition, 86% of surgeons responded that CST improved their surgical techniques, and 71% of surgeons responded that they were less anxious about AVF creation. CONCLUSIONS: CST for AVF creation is useful for surgical education because it enables learning of surgical techniques that are almost equivalent to those in living bodies. In addition, this study suggested that CST not only contributes to the improvement of surgical skills of young surgeons but also promotes the reduction of anxiety and stress about AVF creation.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.