Epidemiological Dynamics of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in the Horn of Africa: The Role of Virus Diversity and Animal Movement
Rattachement africain : Éthiopie, be, Kenya. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The Horn of Africa is a large area of arid and semi-arid land, holding about 10% of the global and 40% of the entire African livestock population. The region's livestock production system is mainly extensive and pastoralist. It faces countless problems, such as a shortage of pastures and watering points, poor access to veterinary services, and multiple endemic diseases like foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). Foot-and-mouth disease is one of the most economically important livestock diseases worldwide and is endemic in most developing countries. Within Africa, five of the seven serotypes of the FMD virus (FMDV) are described, but serotype C is not circulating anymore, a burden unseen anywhere in the world. The enormous genetic diversity of FMDV is favored by an error-prone RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, intra-typic and inter-typic recombination, as well as the quasi-species nature of the virus. This paper describes the epidemiological dynamics of foot-and-mouth disease in the Horn of Africa with regard to the serotypes and topotypes distribution of FMDV, the livestock production systems practiced, animal movement, the role of wildlife, and the epidemiological complexity of FMD. Within this review, outbreak investigation data and serological studies confirm the endemicity of the disease in the Horn of Africa. Multiple topotypes of FMDV are described in the literature as circulating in the region, with further evolution of virus diversity predicted. A large susceptible livestock population and the presence of wild ungulates are described as complicating the epidemiology of the disease. Further, the husbandry practices and legal and illegal trading of livestock and their products, coupled with poor biosecurity practices, are also reported to impact the spread of FMDV within and between countries in the region. The porosity of borders for pastoralist herders fuels the unregulated transboundary livestock trade. There are no systematic control strategies in the region except for sporadic vaccination with locally produced vaccines, while literature indicates that effective control measures should also consider virus diversity, livestock movements/biosecurity, transboundary trade, and the reduction of contact with wild, susceptible ungulates.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Epidemiological Dynamics of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in the Horn of Africa: The Role of Virus Diversity and Animal Movement
- Date Crossref
- 14/04/2023
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Addis Ababa University Addis Ababa University, Éthiopie (code pays fourni par la source)Université ou école supérieure
-
KU Leuven pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Institute of Primate Research Nairobi P.O. Box 24481-, Kenya (code pays fourni par la source)Structure de recherche
-
University of Nairobi Department of Biochemistry University of Nairobi, Kenya (code pays fourni par la source)Université ou école supérieure
-
Sciensano (Belgium) pays non établi dans la noticeEntreprise
-
College of Veterinary Medicine Addis Ababa University, Éthiopie (pays nommé en fin d’affiliation)Université ou école supérieure
-
Laboratory of Host-Pathogen Interaction in Livestock pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
Addis Ababa University (Addis Ababa University, Éthiopie), KU Leuven et Institute of Primate Research (Nairobi P.O. Box 24481-, Kenya), avec 4 autres affiliations. Pays d’affiliation : Éthiopie, Kenya.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.