Figures S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6 from An RNA-Based Digital Circulating Tumor Cell Signature Is Predictive of Drug Response and Early Dissemination in Prostate Cancer
Le résumé fourni par la source
Supplementary Figure S1. (A) Schematic of d-CTC assay. Whole blood is processed using the CTC-iChip, resulting in a bulk product highly enriched for intact CTCs (labeled green) but also contains WBCs (labeled red) and RBCs (unlabeled); Supplementary Figure S2. Graphs showing droplet digital PCR signal for each gene in 12 metastatic prostate cancer patients compared to 34 healthy male control subjects; Supplementary Figure S3. (A, B) Graphs of relationships between Prostate CTCM Score and serum PSA, and CTC droplet digital PCR KLK3 signal and serum PSA at the pre-treatment time point; Supplementary Figure S4. (A) Kaplan-Meier curves for radiographic progression-free survival (R-PFS) by CTC HOXB13 status at pretreatment; Supplementary Figure S5. (A) Heatmap of droplet digital PCR CTC signal after whole transcriptome amplification for blood samples from healthy donor controls arranged by sex and age, and from patients with clinically localized prostate cancer, arranged by D'Amico Risk Group; Supplementary Figure S6. (A) Box plots showing pre-operative leave-one-out cross validated (LOOCV) CTCL Score in clinically localized prostate cancer patients according to microscopic SVI or pelvic LN involvement identified at the time of radical prostatectomy
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Figures S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6 from An RNA-Based Digital Circulating Tumor Cell Signature Is Predictive of Drug Response and Early Dissemination in Prostate Cancer
- Date Crossref
- 03/04/2023
- Éditeur
- American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.