Supplementary Figure S2 from Development of Engineered T Cells Expressing a Chimeric CD16-CD3ζ Receptor to Improve the Clinical Efficacy of Mogamulizumab Therapy Against Adult T-Cell Leukemia
Le résumé fourni par la source
ADCC activity mediated by cCD16ζ-T cells against Mog-opsonized ATL tumor cells was dependent on both effector cell number and Mog dose. However, at a pharmacological dose of Mog, the decline of ADCC was more obviously dependent on the number of effector cells. (a) At a pharmacological dose of Mog (1μg/mL), ADCC activity mediated by cCD16ζ-T cells against Mog-opsonized ATL tumor cells declined sharply when the number of effector cells was lower. In order to exclude NK cell activity, K562-A24 was employed in this experiment as a negative control. Each experiment at the indicated dose of Mog was conducted in triplicate using three independent sets of cells from three different healthy donors. LCL, EBV-immortalized B cell line; Mog, mogamulizumab. Each experiment was conducted in triplicate (n=3). Error bars depict SD. (b) In the presence of a sufficient number of effector cells (E/T ratio 5:1), ADCC activity mediated by cCD16ζ-T cells against ATL tumor cells was also Mog dose-dependent. However, at pharmacological doses of Mog (>0.1μg/mL), the decline of ADCC activity was limited in comparison to that observed in S2a. LCL, EBV-immortalized B cell line: Mog, mogamulizumab. Each experiment was conducted in triplicate (n=3). Error bars depict SD.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Supplementary Figure S2 from Development of Engineered T Cells Expressing a Chimeric CD16-CD3ζ Receptor to Improve the Clinical Efficacy of Mogamulizumab Therapy Against Adult T-Cell Leukemia
- Date Crossref
- 31/03/2023
- Éditeur
- American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.