Data from Positive Cross-Regulatory Loop Ties GATA-3 to Estrogen Receptor α Expression in Breast Cancer
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract The transcription factor GATA-3 is required for normal mammary gland development, and its expression is highly correlated with estrogen receptor α (ERα) in human breast tumors. However, the functional role of GATA-3 in ERα-positive breast cancers is yet to be established. Here, we show that GATA-3 is required for estradiol stimulation of cell cycle progression in breast cancer cells. The role of GATA-3 in estradiol signaling requires the direct positive regulation of the expression of the ERα gene itself by GATA-3. GATA-3 binds to two cis-regulatory elements located within the ERα gene, and this is required for RNA polymerase II recruitment to ERα promoters. Reciprocally, ERα directly stimulates the transcription of the GATA-3 gene, indicating that these two factors are involved in a positive cross-regulatory loop. Moreover, GATA-3 and ERα regulate their own expression in breast cancer cells. Hence, this transcriptional coregulatory mechanism accounts for the robust coexpression of GATA-3 and ERα in human breast cancers. In addition, these results highlight the crucial role of GATA-3 for the response of ERα-positive breast cancers to estradiol. Moreover, they identify GATA-3 as a critical component of the master cell-type–specific transcriptional network including ERα and FoxA1 that dictates the phenotype of hormone-dependent breast cancer. [Cancer Res 2007;67(13):6477–83]
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Data from Positive Cross-Regulatory Loop Ties GATA-3 to Estrogen Receptor α Expression in Breast Cancer
- Date Crossref
- 30/03/2023
- Éditeur
- American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.