Experiment Study on the Effectiveness of Various and Mixed Kinds of Low Expansion Foam of 120# Gasoline Pool Fire Suppression

Le résumé fourni par la source

Storage tank fires can endanger society and the environment by generating intense heat radiation, rapidly spreading blazes, and cataclysmic explosions. Various types of foam and even two or more mixed foams are commonly used in storage tank fire disposal sites. This research aims to experimentally and analytically assess the efficacy of various and mixed forms of foam in putting out 120# gasoline pool fires. A series of foam fire extinguishing and re-ignition tests were conducted using a laboratory fire-extinguishing device that gently released low-expansion foam. In this work, a 2.4 m-diameter steel round tray was utilized to model the full-surface fire of an oilcan in a large oil depot base. The non-dimensional (T* = TExtinguishing/Tboiling point) average temperature of 0.62–0.66 is used in this study to represent the fire extinguishing temperatures of 120# gasoline fuel. The power law is still followed during the spreading phase as the length of the foam spreads further with time. When combined, 6% aqueous film-forming foam solution and alcohol-resistant aqueous film-forming foam solution (AFFF + AFFF/AR) have the highest flow velocity of 0.0189 m s−1. According to the results, synthesis foam solution combined with alcohol-resistant fluoroprotein foam (S + FP/AR) provided the greatest cooling effect, followed by S + S/AR (alcohol-resistant synthetic foam solution), AFFF/AR, S + AFFF, S/AR + AFFF, and finally S/AR + AFFF. According to the results, foam with an expansion ratio of 8.7:1 (FP (fluoroprotein foam solution) + AFFF/AR) has greater re-ignition resistance and burn-back protection. A referable tactic for choosing foam for liquid fire suppression is shown in this paper. The results suggested that FP and AFFF should be used for effective fire suppression in this hydrocarbon fuel fire rescue. Then, we can use synthetic foam and AR foams to provide continuous cooling and prevent the fire from re-igniting through efficient foam coverage.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.