Single-Donor and Pooling Strategies for Fecal Microbiota Transfer Product Preparation in Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) have a less diverse microbiome than healthy subjects. Multiple studies have evaluated fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) in these patients using different methods of product preparation, doses, and routes of administration. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy of single-donor (SDN) and multidonor (MDN) strategies for product preparation. METHODS: Systematic searches were performed in Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Orbit Intelligence for studies comparing FMT products manufactured using SDN or MDN strategies to placebo in patients with UC. Fourteen controlled studies were selected for meta-analysis (10 randomized and 4 nonrandomized). The treatment response was assessed by using fixed- and random-effects models, and the significance of the indirect difference between the interventions was assessed using a network approach. RESULTS: Considering all 14 studies, MDN and SDN were superior to placebo in terms of treatment response (risk ratios [RRs]: 4.41 and 1.57, respectively [P ≤ 0.001 for both]), and MDN was superior to SDN (RR: 2.81, P = 0.005). Meta-analysis of the 10 studies with high quality of evidence showed that MDN was superior to SDN in terms of treatment response (RR: 2.31, P = 0.042). Results were identical for both models. DISCUSSION: There was a significant clinical benefit (remission) for patients with UC who received FMT with products manufactured by MDN strategies. Reduction of donor effect may lead to a gain in microbial diversity that could improve response to treatment. These results may have implications in the treatment approach of other diseases amenable to microbiome manipulation.JOURNAL/cltg/04.03/01720094-202305000-00002/2FFU1/v/2023-05-23T220055Z/r/image-tiff.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.