Segmental myocardial viability by echocardiography at rest
Rattachement africain : no. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Myocardial viability assessment adds value to the therapeutic decision-making of patients with ischemic heart disease. In this feasibility study, we investigated whether established echocardiographic measurements of post-systolic shortening (PSS), strain, strain rate and wall motion score (WMS) can discover viable myocardial segments. Our hypothesis is that non-viable myocardial segments are both akinetic and without PSS. METHODS: The study population consisted of 26 examinations strictly selected by visible dysfunction. We assessed WMS, strain by speckle tracking and strain rate by tissue Doppler. The segments (16*26 = 416) were categorized into either normokinetic/hypokinetic or akinetic/dyskinetic and whether there was PSS. The reference method was the presence of scar with segmental percentage volume scar fraction >50%, detected by late gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Agreement with echocardiography was evaluated by Kappa coefficient. RESULTS: WMS had Kappa coefficient 0.43 (sensitivity 99%, specificity 35%). Kappa coefficient of strain was 0.28 (sensitivity 98%, specificity 23%). By combining PSS in akinetic segments with WMS and strain, the Kappa coefficient was 0.06 and 0.08 respectively. CONCLUSION: Segmental viability was best shown by the presence of systolic function. Post-systolic shortening adds no value to the assessment of segmental myocardial viability.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Segmental myocardial viability by echocardiography at rest
- Date Crossref
- 21/02/2023
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.