Seroprevalence of Brucella Infection in Wild Boars (Sus scrofa) of Bavaria, Germany, 2019 to 2021 and Associated Genome Analysis of Five B. suis Biovar 2 Isolates
Le résumé fourni par la source
Brucella species are highly pathogenic zoonotic agents and are found in vertebrates all over the world. To date, Germany is officially declared free from brucellosis and continuous surveillance is currently limited to farm ruminants. However, porcine brucellosis, mostly caused by B. suis biovar 2, is still found in wild boars and hares. In the present study, a three-year monitoring program was conducted focusing on the wild boar population in the state of Bavaria. Serologic screening of 11,956 animals and a direct pathogen detection approach, including a subset of 681 tissue samples, was carried out. The serologic incidence was 17.9%, which is in approximate accordance with previously published results from various European countries. Applying comparative whole genome analysis, five isolated B. suis biovar 2 strains from Bavaria could be assigned to three known European genetic lineages. One isolate was closely related to another strain recovered in Germany in 2006. Concluding, porcine brucellosis is endemic in Bavaria and the wild boar population represents a reservoir for genetically distinct B. suis biovar 2 strains. However, the transmission risk of swine brucellosis to humans and farm animals is still regarded as minor due to low zoonotic potential, awareness, and biosafety measures.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Seroprevalence of Brucella Infection in Wild Boars (Sus scrofa) of Bavaria, Germany, 2019 to 2021 and Associated Genome Analysis of Five B. suis Biovar 2 Isolates
- Date Crossref
- 14/02/2023
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.