The PD-L1 Expression and Tumor-Infiltrating Immune Cells Predict an Unfavorable Prognosis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Adenosquamous Carcinoma
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a vital role in the development, progression, and metastasis of pancreatic cancer (PC). The composition of the TME and its potential prognostic value remains to be fully understood, especially in adenosquamous carcinoma of pancreas (ASCP) patients. Immunohistochemistry was used to explore the clinical significance of CD3, CD4, CD8, FoxP3, and PD-L1 expression within the TME and to identify correlations with the prognosis of PC in a series of 29 patients with ASCP and 54 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Data from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were accessed to obtain the scRNA-seq data and transcriptome profiles. Seurat was used to process the scRNA-seq data, and CellChat was used to analyze cell–cell communication. CIBERSORT was used to approximate the constitution of tumor-infiltrating immune cell (TICs) profiles. Higher levels of PD-L1 were linked with a shorter overall survival in ASCP (p = 0.0007) and PDAC (p = 0.0594). A higher expression of CD3+ and CD8+ T-cell infiltration was significantly correlated with a better prognosis in PC. By influencing the composition of tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TICs), high levels of PD-L1 expression are linked with a shorter overall survival in ASCP and PDAC.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The PD-L1 Expression and Tumor-Infiltrating Immune Cells Predict an Unfavorable Prognosis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Adenosquamous Carcinoma
- Date Crossref
- 09/02/2023
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.