Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2023 article

Respiratory Support Techniques for COVID-19-Related ARDS in a Sub-Saharan African Country

13Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
9Institutions déclarées
4Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Background Limited data from low-income countries report on respiratory support techniques in COVID-19-associated ARDS. Research Question Which respiratory support techniques are used in patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS in Uganda? Study Design and Methods A multicenter, prospective, observational study was conducted at 13 Ugandan hospitals during the pandemic and included adults with COVID-19-associated ARDS. Patient characteristics, clinical and laboratory data, initial and most advanced respiratory support techniques, and 28-day mortality were recorded. Standard tests, log-rank tests, and logistic regression analyses were used for statistical analyses. Results Four hundred ninety-nine patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS (mild, n = 137; moderate, n = 247; and severe, n = 115) were included (ICU admission, 38.9%). Standard oxygen therapy (SOX), high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO), CPAP, noninvasive ventilation (NIV), and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) was used as the first-line (most advanced) respiratory support technique in 37.3% (35.3%), 10% (9.4%), 11.6% (4.8%), 23.4% (14.4%), and 17.6% (36.6%) of patients, respectively. The first-line respiratory support technique was escalated in 19.8% of patients. Twenty-eight-day mortality was 51.9% (mild ARDS, 13.1%; moderate ARDS, 62.3%; severe ARDS, 75.7%; P < .001) and was associated with respiratory support techniques as follows: SOX, 19.9%; HFNO, 31.9%; CPAP, 58.3%; NIV 61.1%; and IMV, 83.9% ( P < .001). Proning was used in 79 patients (15.8%; 59 of 79 awake) and was associated with lower mortality (40.5% vs 54%; P = .03). The oxygen saturation to Fio 2 ratio (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-0.99; P < . 001) and respiratory rate (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.12; P = . 002) at admission and NIV (OR, 6.31; 95% CI, 2.29-17.37; P < . 001) or IMV (OR, 8.08; 95% CI, 3.52-18.57; P < . 001) use were independent risk factors for death. Interpretation SOX, HFNO, CPAP, NIV, and IMV were used as respiratory support techniques in patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS in Uganda. Although these data are observational, they suggest that the use of SOX and HFNO therapy as well as awake proning are associated with a lower mortality resulting from COVID-19-associated ARDS in a resource-limited setting.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Respiratory Support Techniques for COVID-19-Related ARDS in a Sub-Saharan African Country
Date Crossref
01/08/2023
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Respiratory Support and MechanismsMechanical Circulatory Support DevicesCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.