Disparities in Adherence to Concussion Clinical Care Recommendations in a Pediatric Population

Le résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the relationship of sociodemographic factors to adherence to provider recommendations for pediatric concussion. SETTING: Primary care (PC) practices within the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia network. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 5 to 18 years old who presented to any PC site for concussion from September 26, 2019, to December 31, 2019. DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was adherence to follow-up recommendations as defined by (1) continued follow-up until provider clearance to return to full activity; (2) no more than 2 no-show visits; and (3) for those referred to specialty care (SC), attending at least 1 visit. We compared adherence by race/ethnicity, insurance, age, sex, injury mechanism, and repeat head injury using bivariate and multivariate analyses. A secondary outcome of referral to SC was compared by sociodemographic factors. RESULTS: A total of 755 patients were included. Overall, 80.5% of the patients met adherence criteria. Following adjustment, non-Hispanic Black patients and publicly insured/self-pay patients were less likely to adhere to recommendations than non-Hispanic White patients (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37-1.00) and privately insured patients (AOR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30-0.75), respectively. When assessing differences in referral to SC, non-Hispanic Black patients and publicly insured/self-pay patients were more likely to receive a referral than their non-Hispanic White peers (OR = 1.56; 95% CI, 1.00-2.45) and privately insured patients (OR = 1.56; 95% CI, 1.05-2.32), respectively. CONCLUSION: This study highlights disparities in adherence to concussion care recommendations, with non-Hispanic Black and publicly insured/self-pay patients less likely to adhere to follow-up recommendations than non-Hispanic White and privately insured patients, respectively. These disparities may impact recovery trajectories. Future studies should aim to identify specific individual- and system-level barriers preventing adherence to care in order to ultimately inform targeted interventions to achieve equity in care delivery and outcomes.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.