Descemet Stripping Without Endothelial Keratoplasty in Early-Stage Central Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy: Long-term Results

Le résumé fourni par la source

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report long-term results of Descemet stripping without endothelial keratoplasty (DWEK) associated with phacoemulsification in patients with early-stage central Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. METHODS: This is a retrospective study, including all patients submitted to DWEK associated with cataract surgery with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Included patients had central confluent guttae confirmed with specular microscopy, a clear peripheral endothelium (with a peripheral endothelial count >1500 cells/mm 2 ), and a central pachymetry <600 μm. The main end points were the presence of a clear cornea and time that was needed to achieve transparency, best-corrected visual acuity in logMAR, endothelial central cell count (ECC), and central pachymetry. RESULTS: A total of 22 eyes were included with a mean follow-up of 40.8 ± 10.5 months. At baseline, mean central pachymetry was 536 ± 34 mm and 6 eyes had countable ECC (mean 1138 ± 190 cells/mm 2 ). Twenty eyes (90.9%) achieved good corneal transparency 3.2 ± 1.1 months after surgery. There was a significant improvement in logMAR best-corrected visual acuity compared with baseline (0.13 ± 0.10 vs. 0.48 ± 0.24, respectively, P < 0.001). Endothelial central repopulation was observed in all successful cases. Twelve months after DWEK, ECC was 1449 ± 344 cells/mm 2 and 1393 ± 450 cells/mm 2 at the end of follow-up, without a significant decrease between this period ( P = 0.081). Only 2 eyes (9.1%) did not achieve corneal transparency and were submitted to an endothelial keratoplasty. CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, DWEK is a safe and effective procedure in selected cases of early-stage central Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. This seems to be a promising technique, delaying or avoiding endothelial transplantation.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.