Clinical disease activity is a major determinant of plasma D-dimer elevation in outpatients with rheumatoid arthritis: A hospital-based cross-sectional study
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with plasma D-dimer levels in outpatients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We consecutively recruited 460 RA patients who visited our hospital for routine follow-ups between June and October 2021. Plasma D-dimer, RA-related characteristics, comorbidities, and cardiovascular and venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk factors were examined at enrolment. Patients with elevated D-dimer levels underwent whole-leg venous ultrasonography to diagnose deep vein thrombosis (DVT). RESULTS: Participants had no DVT signs or symptoms. Among them, 252 (54.8%) were positive for plasma D-dimer (≥0.5 μg/ml) and 40 (8.7%) had high D-dimer levels (≥3 μg/ml). The mean was 1.07 μg/ml. After adjustments, age [odds ratio (OR) 1.88 per additional 10 years, P = .003], high and moderate clinical disease activity index (OR 8.79, P < .001), and the presence of comorbidities or cardiovascular/VTE risk factors (OR 2.94, P = .017) were identified as the factors independently associated with high D-dimer levels. Among patients with D-dimer levels ≥3 μg/ml, 10 (25%) had DVT in their lower limbs, and D-dimer levels were significantly higher in patients with DVT compared with those without it (mean 6.0 vs. 4.1 μg/ml, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical disease activity is a major contributor to plasma D-dimer elevation in RA outpatients.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Clinical disease activity is a major determinant of plasma D-dimer elevation in outpatients with rheumatoid arthritis: A hospital-based cross-sectional study
- Date Crossref
- 02/02/2023
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.