Longitudinal study on MRI and neuropathological findings: Neither DSC-perfusion derived rCBVmax nor vessel densities correlate between newly diagnosed and progressive glioblastoma

Le résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: When evaluating MRIs for glioblastoma progression, previous scans are usually included into the review. Nowadays dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC)-perfusion is an essential component in MR-diagnostics of gliomas, since the extent of hyperperfusion upon first diagnosis correlates with gene expression and survival. We aimed to investigate if this initial perfusion signature also characterizes the glioblastoma at time of progression. If so, DSC-perfusion data from the initial diagnosis could be of diagnostic benefit in follow-up assessments. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 65 patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase wildtype glioblastoma who had received technically identical DSC-perfusion measurements at initial diagnosis and at time of first progression. We determined maximum relative cerebral blood volume values (rCBVmax) by standardized re-evaluation of the data including leakage correction. In addition, the corresponding tissue samples from 24 patients were examined histologically for the maximum vessel density within the tumor. Differences (paired t-test/ Wilcoxon matched pairs test) and correlations (Spearman) between the measurements at both timepoints were calculated. RESULTS: The rCBVmax was consistently lower at time of progression compared to rCBVmax at time of first diagnosis (p < .001). There was no correlation between the rCBVmax values at both timepoints (r = .12). These findings were reflected in the histological examination, with a lower vessel density in progressive glioblastoma (p = .01) and no correlation between the two timepoints (r = -.07). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the extent of hyperperfusion in glioblastoma at first diagnosis is not a sustaining tumor characteristic. Hence, the rCBVmax at initial diagnosis should be disregarded when reviewing MRIs for glioblastoma progression.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.