Impact of metformin on the incidence of human cholangiocarcinoma in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most common liver cancer. Diabetes is a well-known risk factor; however, treatment with metformin has been reported to be protective for several cancers, but data on CCA are still sparse and heterogeneous. We performed this meta-analysis to investigate the role of metformin as a potential protective factor for CCA. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, from the date of inception to November 2022, for studies analyzing CCA rate in patients taking metformin. Twenty-nine articles were initially identified, of which four were eligible and included in our systematic review and meta-analysis, from which we estimated the relative risk (RR). The rate of CCA was lower for diabetic patients taking metformin than diabetic patients without metformin intake when comparing two highest quality studies [RR, 0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.290-0.508; P < 0.001], and three studies with similar inclusion criteria (RR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.51-0.35; P < 0.001) without significant statistical heterogeneity among them (I2 = 29.83%, P = 0,2326 and I2 = 35.08%; P = 0.2143, respectively). Our study demonstrated a significant impact of metformin in reducing the risk of CCA by nearly 62-66% in diabetic patients taking metformin.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Impact of metformin on the incidence of human cholangiocarcinoma in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Date Crossref
- 23/12/2022
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.