Evaluation of Strontium Interference in Calcium Measurement Procedures and Content in Supplements as Measured by ICP-MS

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Bone health supplements containing strontium are available without prescription, however, the effects of strontium interference on clinical laboratory calcium measurement procedures are unknown. METHODS: To evaluate strontium interference on total calcium measurements, plasma pools with exogenously added strontium were measured by 3 total calcium measurement procedures. For ionized calcium measurements, whole blood pools prepared with exogenously added strontium were measured by 2 ionized calcium measurement procedures. An inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry assay (ICP-MS) was validated for research measurements of strontium content in commercially available supplements. RESULTS: Exogenous strontium addition to plasma caused positive bias for total calcium measurements. Strontium concentrations of 1.0 mg/dL (0.114 mmol/L), 2.5 mg/dL (0.284 mmol/L), and 5.0 mg/Dl (0.568 mmol/L) resulted in mean biases of 1.9% to 3.5%, 4.9% to 9.0%, and 10.8% to 19.2%, respectively, for total calcium measurement procedures. Biases for ionized calcium measurements were less than 4.5% for a strontium concentration of 5.0 mg/dL (0.568 mmol/L). An in-house-developed ICP-MS assay for strontium in commercially available supplements exhibited within-laboratory and within-run coefficients of variation of less than 3%, and a linear response was obtained over the assay analytical measurement range of 10 to 100 000 ng/mL (0.0001 to 1.141 mmol/L). Strontium recovery for the ICP-MS assay was 97.1% to 105.3%. The largest amount of strontium measured in dietary supplements was 395 mg in a 1054 mg tablet. CONCLUSIONS: Some dietary supplements contain larger amounts of strontium than indicated on the product label. High concentrations of strontium may cause significant interference for total calcium measurement procedures, but ionized calcium measurement procedures are not significantly affected.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.