S935 Efficacy and Safety of Etrolizumab in Treatment of Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

Résumé fourni par la source

Introduction: Recent clinical trials have assessed the efficacy and safety of Etrolizumab in treatment of ulcerative colitis. Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of Etrolizumab for induction and maintenance of remission in moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. Methods: We searched the following databases: PUBMED, Web Of Science, OVID, and SCOPUS in 15 January 2022. Inclusion criteria were any phase 2 and 3 clinical trials that compare Etrolizumab with placebo in treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis, excluding case reports, animal studies, phase 1 trials, and conference abstracts. We used RevMan software (5.4) for the meta-analysis. Results: Five clinical trials were included in our meta-analysis. The total number of patients included in the study is 1249 patients, 960 patients in the Etrolizumab group, and 399 patients in the placebo group. In the induction phase, the pooled analyses showed a statistically significant association between Etrolizumab and increased clinical remission, and endoscopic remission compared with placebo (RR= 2.66, [95% CI= 1.69 to 4.19], P < 0.0001), and (RR= 2.35, [95% CI= 1.52 to 3.65], P = 0.0001). In the maintenance phase, the pooled analyses showed a statistically significant association between Etrolizumab and increased histologic remission and endoscopic remission (RR= 2.04, [95% CI= 1.40 to 2.99], P = 0.0002) and (RR= 1.92, [95% CI= 1.29 to 2.95], P = 0.001). No statistically significant difference was observed in adverse events between Etrolizumab and placebo in induction and maintenance phases. Conclusion: Our results show that Etrolizumab is an effective and safe drug for the induction and maintenance of clinical remission in moderate to severe ulcerative colitis patients proved by histologic and endoscopic findings. Future randomized trials are still needed to compare Etrolizumab to the other agents and further establish its value for the practice.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.