RANDOMIZED STUDY ON THE EFFICACY OF NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY (NPWT) IN THE PREVENTION OF SURGICAL SITE COMPLICATIONS
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Introduction The secondary consequences of SSC worsen patient's quality of life, while increasing healthcare costs considerably. Applying preventive measures to reduce this complication rate should be one of the priorities of improving healthcare. Methods We conducted a prospective randomized study between March 2019 and March 2021 in a General Surgery Department of a tertiary hospital. Operated patients with risk factors for developing (SSC) were included according to the established protocol, and were randomized to the use of NPWT or conventional dressing (CD). The aim of our study was to compare SSC (skin dehiscence, seroma, hematoma, edge necrosis, and wound infection) in both groups, and to assess the benefit of NPWT. Results We studied 267 patients, 124 (46.4%) in the NPWT group and 143 (53.6%) in the CD group, with a mean age of 68 (±12.9) years. 96.2% of the patients corresponded to the ASA II or III classification. A total of 72 (27%) SSC were observed, being significantly lower in the NPWT group (odds ratio [OR] 0.49; confidence interval [CI] 0.28–0.85; p <0.05). The median hospital stay was 10 (7–20) days. Relative risk reduction (RRR) was 41.5% and absolute risk reduction (ARR) was 14%, with a number needed to treat (NNT) of 6.9. Conclusion NPWT decreases the risk of SSC, so its use should be considered in patients with risk factors.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- RANDOMIZED STUDY ON THE EFFICACY OF NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY (NPWT) IN THE PREVENTION OF SURGICAL SITE COMPLICATIONS
- Date Crossref
- 04/01/2023
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.