Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2022 article

Early surgery versus conservative treatment in patients with traumatic intracerebral hematoma: a CENTER-TBI study

3Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
7Institutions déclarées
3Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : nl, gb, be. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Traumatic intracerebral hematoma (t-ICH) is common and associated with unfavourable outcome.Nevertheless, evidence regarding the optimal treatment is limited and relies mostly on the STITCH (Trauma) trial.Our study aims to compare the effectiveness of early surgery (ES) to initial conservative treatment (ICT) in patients with a t-ICH.Methods: Two prospective observational studies that included patients from 2015 to 2020 were analyzed.Patients with TBI and a large t-ICH within 48 hours of the injury were included.ES was defined as craniotomy with hematoma evacuation and/or decompressive craniectomy.ICT consisted of monitoring and medical management and could contain delayed surgery (>48 hours).Primary outcome was the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) score at 6 months analysed with multivariable proportional odds logistic regression.Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, treatment failure, dichotomized GOSE and Quality of Life after Brain Injury at 6 months.Subgroups included injury severity (mild vs. moderate vs. severe) and isolated vs. non-isolated t-ICH.Results:Overall, 367 patients with a large t-ICH were included, of whom 160 received ES and 207 received ICT.Patients in the ES group were younger (median age 54 vs. 58 years), and more severely injured (median GCS 7 vs. 10) compared to those in the ICT group.After adjustment for confounders, ES nor ICT was significantly associated with better functional outcome (odds ratio (OR) 1.1, 95% CI [0.6-1.7]).Similar results were found for the secondary outcomes.In moderate TBI and isolated t-ICH, ES was associated with better outcome (OR 1.5 [95% CI, 1.1-2.0],and 1.8 [95% CI, 1.3-2.5],respectively).Conversely, in mild TBI and those with a smaller t-ICH (<33cc) ICT was associated with better outcome (OR 0.6 [95% CI, 0.4-0.9]and 0.8 [95% CI, 0.5-1.0],respectively).Conclusion: Early surgery in t-ICH may only benefit those with moderate TBI and isolated t-ICH, compatible with observed effects in the STITCH (Trauma) trial.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Early surgery versus conservative treatment in patients with traumatic intracerebral hematoma: a CENTER-TBI study
Date Crossref
01/01/2022
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchMedical Imaging and Analysis

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.