Mortality prediction using a modified R2CHA2DS2-VASc score among hospitalized COVID-19 patients
Rattachement africain : il. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: The CHA2DS2-VASc score incorporates comorbidities with prognostic implications in COVID-19. Aim: To assess whether a modified score (M-R2CHA2DS2-VASc), which includes pre-admission kidney function and male sex, could be used to classify mortality risk among people hospitalized with COVID-19. Methods: A retrospective study of adults admitted for COVID-19. Pre-admission glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated based on serum creatinine and used for scoring M-R2CHA2DS2-VASc. Participants were categorized according to the M-R2CHA2DS2-VASc categories as 0-1 (low), 2-3 (intermediate), or ≥4 (high), and according to initial COVID-19 severity. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality rates. Results: Among 800 participants, 55% were males, mean age 65.2±17 years. There were similar proportions of subjects across M-R2CHA2DS2-VASc categories. 30-day mortality was higher in those in higher M-R2CHA2DS2-VASc category and with severe or critical COVID-19 at admission. Mortality rates were 4.7%, 17% and 31% among subjects in the low, intermediate, and high M-R2CHA2DS2-VASc categories, respectively (p<0.001). All-cause 90-day mortality remained significantly associated with M-R2CHA2DS2-VASc. Conclusions: The M-R2CHA2DS2-VASc score is associated with 30-day mortality rates among patients hospitalized with COVID-19, and adds predictive value when combined with initial COVID-19 severity.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Mortality prediction using a modified R2CHA2DS2-VASc score among hospitalized COVID-19 patients
- Date Crossref
- 04/09/2022
- Éditeur
- European Respiratory Society
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.