Outcomes of Arthroscopic Scaphoid Excision and Lunocapitate Fusion for Advanced Traumatic Arthritis of the Wrist
Rattachement africain : kr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Arthroscopic lunocapitate (LC) fusion can be an alternative surgical treatment for scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) or scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) of the wrist. We retrospectively reviewed patients who had arthroscopic LC fusion to estimate clinical and radiological outcomes. Methods: From January 2013 to February 2017, all patients with SLAC (stage II or III) or SNAC (stage II or III) wrists, who underwent arthroscopic LC fusion with scaphoidectomy and were followed up for a minimum of 2 years, were enrolled in this retrospective study. Clinical outcomes included visual analog scale (VAS) pain, grip strength, active range of wrist motion, Mayo wrist score (MWS), and the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. Radiologic outcomes included bony union, carpal height ratio, joint space height ratio, and loosening of screws. We also performed group analysis between patients with 1 and 2 headless compression screws to fix the LC interval. Results: = 0.024). Conclusions: Arthroscopic scaphoid excision and LC fusion for patients with advanced SLAC or SNAC of the wrist was effective and safe only in cases fixed with 2 headless compression screws. We recommend arthroscopic LC fusion using 2 screws rather than 1 to decrease radiolucent loosening, which might affect complications such as nonunion, delayed union, or screw migration.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Outcomes of Arthroscopic Scaphoid Excision and Lunocapitate Fusion for Advanced Traumatic Arthritis of the Wrist
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2023
- Éditeur
- XMLink
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.