Effects of robotic upper limb treatment after stroke on cognitive patterns: A systematic review
Rattachement africain : it, us, am, Mali. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Robotic therapy (RT) has been internationally recognized for the motor rehabilitation of the upper limb. Although it seems that RT can stimulate and promote neuroplasticity, the effectiveness of robotics in restoring cognitive deficits has been considered only in a few recent studies. OBJECTIVE: To verify whether, in the current state of the literature, cognitive measures are used as inclusion or exclusion criteria and/or outcomes measures in robotic upper limb rehabilitation in stroke patients. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies eligible were identified through PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science from inception to March 2021. RESULTS: Eighty-one studies were considered in this systematic review. Seventy-three studies have at least a cognitive inclusion or exclusion criteria, while only seven studies assessed cognitive outcomes. CONCLUSION: Despite the high presence of cognitive instruments used for inclusion/exclusion criteria their heterogeneity did not allow the identification of a guideline for the evaluation of patients in different stroke stages. Therefore, although the heterogeneity and the low percentage of studies that included cognitive outcomes, seemed that the latter were positively influenced by RT in post-stroke rehabilitation. Future larger RCTs are needed to outline which cognitive scales are most suitable and their cut-off, as well as what cognitive outcome measures to use in the various stages of post-stroke rehabilitation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Effects of robotic upper limb treatment after stroke on cognitive patterns: A systematic review
- Date Crossref
- 01/12/2022
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Università Campus Bio-Medico pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
BioClinica (United States) pays non établi dans la noticeEntreprise
-
University of Ferrara pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
IRCCS San Camillo Hospital pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Regione Siciliana pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
National Institute of Health National Center for Innovative Technologies in Public Health pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
Azienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
PENTA Foundation pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
Università Campus Bio-Medico, BioClinica (United States) et University of Ferrara, avec 9 autres affiliations. Pays d’affiliation : Mali.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.