Fractions strategy differences in those born extremely preterm
Rattachement africain : gb, us, kr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Introduction To investigate the effects of different strategies and cognitive load we explored brain hemodynamic responses associated with the use of different strategies to solve subtraction of fractions. We focused on those born extremely preterm (EPT; <28 weeks’ gestation) as they are known to have cognitive challenges and struggle with mathematics. We also included a group of full-term (FT) peers for comparison. Methods Functional MRI was acquired while the participants mentally solved fraction equations using either a strategy based on improper or mixed fractions. Different fraction item types were given, which affected respective required cognitive loads per strategy. Diffusion and T1-weighted structural images were also acquired. Results The EPT and FT groups differed in terms of task-related hemodynamic responses. Functional group differences were greatest when strategies were applied to item types that result in high cognitive load. Other findings showed reduced white and grey matter volume and reduced white matter connectivity in widespread areas in the EPT group compared to the FT group. Conclusion The understanding of function and structure presented here may help inform pedagogical practices by allowing for tailoring of mathematical education through identifying suitable strategy adoption that depends on item type, to circumvent weaknesses in cognitive skills.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Fractions strategy differences in those born extremely preterm
- Date Crossref
- 06/12/2022
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.