Assessment of Clinical Information Quality in Digital Health Technologies: International eDelphi Study
Rattachement africain : gb, ie, de, ae, nl, hr, Gambie, Nigéria, sg. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Digital health technologies (DHTs), such as electronic health records and prescribing systems, are transforming health care delivery around the world. The quality of information in DHTs is key to the quality and safety of care. We developed a novel clinical information quality (CLIQ) framework to assess the quality of clinical information in DHTs. OBJECTIVE: This study explored clinicians' perspectives on the relevance, definition, and assessment of information quality dimensions in the CLIQ framework. METHODS: We used a systematic and iterative eDelphi approach to engage clinicians who had information governance roles or personal interest in information governance; the clinicians were recruited through purposive and snowball sampling techniques. Data were collected using semistructured online questionnaires until consensus was reached on the information quality dimensions in the CLIQ framework. Responses on the relevance of the dimensions were summarized to inform decisions on retention of the dimensions according to prespecified rules. Thematic analysis of the free-text responses was used to revise definitions and the assessment of dimensions. RESULTS: Thirty-five clinicians from 10 countries participated in the study, which was concluded after the second round. Consensus was reached on all dimensions and categories in the CLIQ framework: informativeness (accuracy, completeness, interpretability, plausibility, provenance, and relevance), availability (accessibility, portability, security, and timeliness), and usability (conformance, consistency, and maintainability). A new dimension, searchability, was introduced in the availability category to account for the ease of finding needed information in the DHTs. Certain dimensions were renamed, and some definitions were rephrased to improve clarity. CONCLUSIONS: The CLIQ framework reached a high expert consensus and clarity of language relating to the information quality dimensions. The framework can be used by health care managers and institutions as a pragmatic tool for identifying and forestalling information quality problems that could compromise patient safety and quality of care. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057430.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Assessment of Clinical Information Quality in Digital Health Technologies: International eDelphi Study
- Date Crossref
- 06/12/2022
- Éditeur
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Imperial College London Department of Primary Care and Public Health pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Coventry University Institute for Health and Wellbeing pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University College Dublin pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
National Health Service pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Hywel Dda University Health Board Health Board pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Glasgow Royal Infirmary pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
University of Oxford pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Croydon Health Services NHS Trust pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
STZ eyetrial pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
University of Limerick pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Department of Primary Care and Public Health — Imperial College London, Institute for Health and Wellbeing — Coventry University et University College Dublin, avec 9 autres affiliations. Pays d’affiliation : Gambie, Nigéria.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.