Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2022 article

Differences in Clinical Course and Management of Sars-CoV2 Infection in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia between the Sequential Pandemic Phases: An Eric Study

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
98Institutions déclarées
23Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : it, gr, ch, rs, gb, es, be, cz, Égypte, ar, de, pt, il, hr, ru, nl, in, se, pl, dk, ro, np, ie. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND. Infection by SARS-CoV2 remains a worldwide health burden. Previous studies by the ERIC (European Research Initiative on CLL) showed that patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have a very-high risk of severe Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID19). In particular, age, CLL-directed treatment, and cardiac failure were identified as significant risk factors of overall survival (OS). Since the beginning of 2020 different treatment strategies have been used to fight COVID19 and different SARS-CoV2 variants alternated during the pandemic, however very few studies analyzed their impact on patients with CLL.AIMS. The aims of this study were to investigate different manifestations, treatments and outcome of COVID19 in patients with CLL/SLL (small lymphocytic lymphoma), and MBL (monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis).METHODS. This is a retrospective international multicenter ERIC study from Jan 2020 till May 2022. CLL diagnosis, COVID-19 management, review of medical history, and assessment of patient status were performed by local investigators following international guidelines. Ninety institutions participated in the study. Statistical analyses were conducted using R software. During the pandemic we identified 4 phases: 1st Jan 2020 - Jun 2020, 2nd Jul 2020 - Feb 2021, 3rd Mar 2021 - Dec 2021 and 4th Jan 2022 - May 2022.RESULTS. We gathered data from 1540 patients (93.8% CLL, 4.1% SLL and 2.1% MBL), 65% males, the median age at COVID19 was 69 years, median CIRS score was 4 (IQR 2-7), 49.6% were treated in the last 12 months before COVID19, 38.8% was on treatment at COVID19 onset (BTK inhibitor-based 51.1%, BCL2 inhibitor-based 20.7%, chemo/chemoimmunotherapy 21.5%, 6.7% others). Overall, 34.4% of patients was managed at home, 49.9% needed hospitalization and 15.7% was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). After a median follow-up of 2.7 months, the infection was resolved in 1124/1540 (73%) cases, while 23% died and 3.6% were still under medical observation.Distribution of patients among time is shown in Fig. 1A. Three hundred and four (19.8%) patients were infected during the 1st, 737 (48%) during the 2nd, 137 (8.9%) during the 3rd and 357 (23.3%) during the last 4th phase.Comparing the features of patients infected in different phases, age at COVID19 and distribution of biological markers were similar, but more patients in the latter phases suffered from arrhythmias (8.2% vs 10.5% vs 16.1% vs 14.2%, p=0.01), chronic renal disease (3.9% vs 5.9% vs 8.9% and 11.1%, p=0.003) and other malignancies (0.3% vs 1.8% vs 2.2% vs 3.6%, p=0.04). Vaccinated patients (0% vs 0.4% vs 45.7% vs 89.1%, p<0.001) and those treated for CLL in the last 12 months (44.1% vs 44.1% vs 55.7% vs 66.1%, p<0.001) were also more common in the last phases.COVID19 signs and symptoms differed between early and late phases, with less fever (p<0.001) and dyspnea (p=0.028) but more fatigue (p<0.001), cough (p<0.001), headache (p<0.001), anosmia/ageusia (p<0.001) and myalgia/arthralgia (p<0.001) in the later phases.COVID19 management also changed over time, with less patients receiving a SARS-CoV2 therapy (87.6% vs 74.7% vs 78.1% vs 67.9%, p<0.001). In particular, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, steroids and anti-IL6/IL6R were more commonly used in the first 2 phases while antiviral and monoclonal antibodies (mAb) were mainly employed in the last 2 phases. Less patients were hospitalized (84.5% vs 67.3% vs 60.3% vs 45.8%, p<0.001), needed ICU admission (20.6% vs 17.2% vs 13.3% vs 8.1%, p<0.001) or died (29.8% vs 25.5% vs 21.8% vs 15.8%, p=0.002) through these phases. These improvements in patients' management led to an increase of OS, with 2-month OS of 70%, 74%, 81% and 83% for patients diagnosed during the 1st, 2nd,3rd and 4th phase (p=0.0015, Fig. 1B).CONCLUSION. We analyzed one of the largest series of patients with CLL infected by SARS-CoV2 over more than 2 years of COVID19 pandemic. Patients infected during the most recent phases, though carrying a higher comorbidity burden, were less frequently hospitalized, only rarely needed ICU admission and died due to the SARS-CoV2 infection in a lower proportion compared to initial phases. The improvement in COVID-19 management with effective antiviral drugs, mAb and the high rate of vaccination together with the change in SARS-CoV2 variants over time may have played an important role in this outcome.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Differences in Clinical Course and Management of Sars-CoV2 Infection in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia between the Sequential Pandemic Phases: An Eric Study
Date Crossref
15/11/2022
Éditeur
American Society of Hematology
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

University of PaduaIRCCS Ospedale San RaffaeleG. Papanikolaou General HospitalCentre for Research and Technology HellasUniversity of BernUniversity Hospital of BernCentar za Promociju NaukeHull York Medical SchoolInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de SalamancaCentro de Investigación del CáncerCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de CáncerInstitut Jules BordetUniversity of UlsterBelfast City HospitalHospital General Universitario De ValenciaHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez DíazHospital TerrassaHospital Clínic de BarcelonaNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensMasaryk UniversityUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro”Ospedale Vito FazziUniversity of Rome Tor VergataAthens Medical CenterMansoura UniversityHospital Italiano La PlataFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei TumoriOspedale Santa MariaAzienda Sanitaria Ospedaliera S.Croce e Carle CuneoUniversity of CologneUniversity Hospital CologneHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro MajadahondaAzienda Ospedaliera di CosenzaHospital Del MarIPO PortoAssaf Harofeh Medical CenterTel Aviv UniversityTel Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterHospital Universitario Infanta LeonorMunich Leukemia Laboratory (Germany)Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenRoyal Marsden HospitalRabin Medical CenterUniversity Hospital DubravaUniversitair Ziekenhuis LeuvenFirst Pavlov State Medical University of St. PetersburgAmsterdam University Medical CentersUniversity of AmsterdamHaga HospitalHospital Universitario de BurgosPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and ResearchUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreAlbert Schweitzer ZiekenhuisOspedali Riuniti Marche NordUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaAzienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare ArrigoHospital Universitario Ramón y CajalUppsala University HospitalPoliclinico Umberto IHospital Universitario de La PrincesaMedical University of LublinAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di BresciaSt James's University HospitalAzienda Ospedaliera G. BrotzuUniversity of Novi SadResearch Institute Hospital 12 de OctubreCopenhagen University HospitalRigshospitaletOspedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di UdineAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di TorinoAristotle University of ThessalonikiNational Medical Research Center for HematologyFatebenefratelli HospitalSpitalul Clinic ColentinaUniversity of VeronaOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIIIZiekenhuis Gelderse ValleiFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore PoliclinicoUniversity of FerraraArcispedale Sant'AnnaShaare Zedek Medical CenterCivil Service HospitalCharles UniversityUniversity Hospital Hradec KrálovéGeneral University Hospital in PragueUniversity of PerugiaClinical Emergency Hospital BucharestBnai Zion Medical CenterSt. James's HospitalPoliclinico San Matteo FondazioneIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere ScientificoUniversity of TurinRijnstate HospitalMaastricht University Medical CentreMarqués de Valdecilla University HospitalUniversity of BergamoUniversity of MilanVita-Salute San Raffaele University

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.