Perinatal outcomes of prenatal cases testing positive for trisomy 9 by noninvasive prenatal testing
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for the detection of fetal trisomy 9 in prenatal screening and to investigate the prenatal appearances and genetic counseling of trisomy 9 fetuses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ultrasonography information, laboratory detection and pregnancy outcome of 16 cases of single pregnancy with trisomy 9 identified by NIPT who received amniocentesis in our prenatal diagnosis center from January 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 16 cases, 2 cases of trisomy 9, 3 cases of trisomy 9 mosaicism, 2 cases reporting of regions of homozygosity and 9 cases of false positive were diagnosed. Among the true positive cases, 4 cases showed abnormal ultrasonic finding: 3 cases terminated pregnancy and 1 case was lost to follow-up. Another 1 case was in utero fetal demise in the second trimester without structural abnormality, and 2 cases were normal live birth without developmental abnormalities. In the 9 cases with normal kayrotyping, 1 case had termination of pregnancy and 1 case with mental retardation and poor cognitive ability, other 7 had good pregnancy outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our results may be helpful for the selection of prenatal diagnostic strategies and genetic counseling for pregnant women with trisomy 9 revealed by NIPT.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Perinatal outcomes of prenatal cases testing positive for trisomy 9 by noninvasive prenatal testing
- Date Crossref
- 01/11/2022
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.