Real-life evaluation of deep learning models trained on two datasets for Plasmodium falciparum detection with thin blood smear images at 500x magnification
Rattachement africain : fr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Malaria is a fatal disease transmitted by bites from mosquito-type vectors. Biologists examined blood smears under a microscope at high magnification (1000×) to identify the presence of parasites in red blood cells (RBCs). Such an examination is laborious and time-consuming. Moreover, microscopists sometimes have difficulty identifying parasitized RBCs due to a lack of skill or practice. Deep learning, especially convolutional neural networks (CNNs) applied for malaria diagnosis, are able to identify complex features of a large number of medical images. The proposed work focuses on the construction of a dataset of blood components images representative of the diagnostic reality captured from 202 patients at 500x magnification. We evaluated through a cross-validation study different deep learning networks for the classification of Plasmodium falciparum-infected RBCs and uninfected blood components. These models include a custom-built CNN, VGG-19, ResNet-50 and EfficientNet-B7. In addition, we conducted the same experiments on a public dataset and compared the performance of the resultant models through a patient-level inference including 200 extra patients. The models trained on our dataset show better performance in terms of generalization and achieved better accuracy, sensitivity and specificity scores of 99.7%, 77.9% and 99.8%, respectively.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Real-life evaluation of deep learning models trained on two datasets for Plasmodium falciparum detection with thin blood smear images at 500x magnification
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2022
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.