Composites of Thermoplastic Starch and Lignin-Rich Agricultural Waste for the Packaging of Fatty Foods
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Walnut shell (WS) has been demonstrated to be a promising and sustainable reinforcement in polymer composites. However, the evaluation of the overall properties provided by this lignin-rich food residue to biopolymer composites, for their use in the food packaging market, has not been evaluated yet. In this work, composite films of thermoplastic starch (TPS) containing either WS or hydrolyzed WS (HWS) and plasticized with a polyglycerol were prepared by spray drying, followed by extrusion and compression molding. TPS composites with HWS exhibited excellent UV light-blocking properties and sustained antioxidant activity for 2 weeks, ideal for preserving fatty foods. Furthermore, the compatibility of WS with TPS has been improved after the hydrolysis of WS with acetic acid. This treatment reduced the dimensions of the WS particles and exposed their hydroxyl groups, improving their compatibility with TPS, and consequently enhancing the mechanical and water vapor barrier properties. Overall, the composites containing 5 wt % of HWS exhibited the best compromise between the mechanical properties and antioxidant activity. Moreover, these composites complied with the safety requirements of the EU legislation regarding the migration of substances from the packaging to the food, in order to be used as food contact materials.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Composites of Thermoplastic Starch and Lignin-Rich Agricultural Waste for the Packaging of Fatty Foods
- Date Crossref
- 11/11/2022
- Éditeur
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.