Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2022 article

Outcomes of Patients Receiving Thrombolysis in a Mobile Stroke Unit: A 4-Year Retrospective, Observational, Single-Center Study

4Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
5Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) eligible for thrombolysis benefit when thrombolysis is administered quickly, and mobile stroke units (MSU) can facilitate timely thrombolysis. We sought to compare time metrics and clinical outcomes of AIS patients receiving thrombolysis in an MSU compared with patients arriving via local emergency medical services (EMS). METHODS: We performed a retrospective, non-randomized, cohort study comparing MSU-arriving to EMS-arriving AIS patients from January 20, 2017 through November 30, 2020. The primary outcome was rate of return to baseline functional status as measured by the modified Rankin Score (mRS) 90 days after thrombolysis. Secondary outcomes included evaluation and treatment intervals from last known well, treatment rate in the first hour of symptoms, hospital length of stay, and mortality. Chi square and Student's t-test were used to compare groups. RESULTS: Of 1752 total patients with prehospital suspected stroke, 975 (55.7%) were transported via MSU, of whom 431 (44.2%) were diagnosed with stroke, including 368 (85.4%) with AIS, and 69 AIS patients (18.8%) received thrombolysis. Of 777 (44.3%) EMS-arriving patients, 373 (48%) were diagnosed with stroke, including 305 (81.8%) with AIS, and 74 (24.3%) received thrombolysis. Though not statistically significant, point estimates of the proportion of AIS patients treated with thrombolysis returning to baseline functional status were more commonly observed for MSU than for EMS transports when the baseline mRS was 0-2 (45.8% vs 33.3%), 0-3 (41.9% vs 33.3%), and 4-5 (71.4% vs 20.0%). MSU patients were more likely to receive thrombolysis in the first 60 minutes of symptom onset (31.9% vs 12.2%, p = 0.006). Overall mortality rates regardless of baseline mRS were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: AIS patients received thrombolysis faster in the MSU compared with EMS and more frequently within 60 minutes of stroke onset. Point estimates for 90-day clinical outcomes of AIS patients treated with thrombolysis favored MSU without a statistically significant difference.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Outcomes of Patients Receiving Thrombolysis in a Mobile Stroke Unit: A 4-Year Retrospective, Observational, Single-Center Study
Date Crossref
06/12/2022
Éditeur
Informa UK Limited
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Acute Ischemic Stroke ManagementStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.