Landscape-scale exposure to multiazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus bioaerosols
Rattachement africain : gb, nl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract We demonstrate country-wide exposures to aerosolized spores of a human fungal pathogen, Aspergillus fumigatus , that has acquired resistance to first line azole clinical antifungal drugs. Assisted by a network of citizen scientists across the United Kingdom, we show that 1 in 20 viable aerosolized spores of this mold are resistant to the agricultural fungicide tebuconazole and 1 in 140 spores are resistant to the four most used azoles for treating clinical aspergillosis infections. Season and proximity to industrial composters were associated with growth of A. fumigatus from air samples, but not with the presence of azole resistance, and hotspots were not stable between sampling periods suggesting a high degree of atmospheric mixing. Genomic analysis shows no distinction between those resistant genotypes found in the environment and in patients, indicating that ~40% (58/150 sequenced genomes) of azole-resistant A. fumigatus infections are acquired from environmental exposures. Due to the ubiquity of this measured exposure, it is crucial that we determine source(s) of azole-resistant A. fumigatus , who is at greatest risk of exposure and how to mitigate these exposures, in order to minimize treatment failure in patients with aspergillosis. One sentence summary UK-wide citizen science surveillance finds a ubiquitous exposure to aerosolized spores of a human fungal pathogen that have evolved in the environment cross-resistance to essential clinical antifungal drugs
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Landscape-scale exposure to multiazole-resistant <i>Aspergillus fumigatus</i> bioaerosols
- Date Crossref
- 07/11/2022
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.